Jim Beam Distillery Production Cheat Sheet

Back in late 2018, I was visiting the Jim Beam Distillery for the Booker’s 30th release. We toured the distillery and the distilling team mentioned that they were running Booker’s that day. After asking a few questions I found out that there are actually different production processes for most of the Beam bourbons. How did I not know this?!

Initially, Jim Beam Distillery only made two bourbons. A high-rye bourbon and a low-rye bourbon. After tasting, Beam would appropriate the different barrels to their different brands. Then Beam started to incorporate wood management. Meaning, they would place certain brands in different parts of the warehouse. I.e. I’ve heard it rumored that Baker’s often comes from higher in the warehouse while Booker’s is pulled from the center. Around 2008 (according to this Chuck Cowdery post) Beam began to adjust the production process for each bourbon. It gets a little confusing. I created this chart to help.

This makes me love Booker’s even more! It comes off the still, into the barrel and into the bottle without a drop of water.

15 comments

    That was really interesting. Thanks. Funny how Jim Beam is the one bourbon I really don’t like and Booker’s is my favorite (sorry, Pappy) and they start out with the same ratios.

    This is interesting, I had always assumed that products of the same mashbill came off the still the same and where in the rickhouse, how long, and how well they age determined what product they become.

    It’s kind of an unconfirmed fact. It’s slipped out over the years although they’re still pretty tight-lipped at the distillery.

    Interesting, thanks for sharing! I guess I always thought Baker’s had a lower barrel entry proof as a way to stand apart from Knob Creek and Booker’s.

    So it’s safe to assume the other Jim Beam labels – Black, Double Oak, BIB, SiB – all follow the same 75/13/12 & 135/125 specs that you list for White label?

    Same assumption for the rest of the OGD offerings – the same specs as 114?

    Hey Blake,
    love it, great research tho! As a german ‘barrel proof’ is always a bit hard to understand because we measure it in ‘volume percent’. Your neat graphic helped in understanding.
    Greetings

Leave a Reply to Judge Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *